<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Seventh Circuit Holds That the “In Care of” and “Business” Exclusions Preclude Coverage Under a Homeowner’s Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sedgwickinsurancelaw.com/2013/02/06/the-seventh-circuit-holds-that-the-%E2%80%9Cin-care-of%E2%80%9D-and-%E2%80%9Cbusiness%E2%80%9D-exclusions-preclude-coverage-under-a-homeowner%E2%80%99s-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sedgwickinsurancelaw.com/2013/02/06/the-seventh-circuit-holds-that-the-%e2%80%9cin-care-of%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9cbusiness%e2%80%9d-exclusions-preclude-coverage-under-a-homeowner%e2%80%99s-policy/</link>
	<description>Sedgwick Insurance Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
